My concern about Pragmatic Play

Social Media & Community Specialist

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

Hi, let me ask you please, who is meant by "we"? And why the mentioned 30%, please? Thank you for reply.

Fortgeschrittener Neuling

Deutschland

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

ich habe beobachtet, dass man bei kleinerem Einsatz wie 0,40 € schon mal 1550 X machen kann!

Der Multi ist nicht so hoch, wenn man höher spielt

Social Media & Community Specialist

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

I guess that the max multiplier varies per game. What do you think?

Kenner

Griechenland

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

90% of my bets are €0.40-0.60, it always kills me, once in 100 it gives something, they give spins more than once when I play €100, I have never succeeded, the provider is a multinational fraud

Social Media & Community Specialist

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

In this case, I'd say that maybe the volatility is too low for such stakes.

Don't want to bother you with theory, but I find this information provided by Daniel pretty useful:

"Try to look at this article. It really describes all the essential things that you should learn about slots. Just to sum it up for you a bit:

slots have different RTP, you want to play slots with higher RTP (around 96%), because they pay more

you need to pay attention, because some game providers allow casinos to decrease the RTP on their slots, so it can happen to you, that the same slot can have different RTP in 2 different casinos. Anyway, good casinos always show you how much is the RTP on a specific game

there are high volatility and low volatility games, when you play low volatility games, you win quite often, but the winnings are often lower than your bets. When you play high volatility games (for example jackpot games are often high volatility games), you can have a dead spin after a dead spin, maybe 50 in a row, but then you enter a special bonus feature and win a big part of you losses back. Anyway, if you stop playing earlier, you feel like the slot didn't pay you anything"

Kenner

Griechenland

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

you said it yourself, some providers allow the casinos to reduce the rtp, I say that they not only reduce it but cut it in half, there is no excuse for "pragmatic play", I have played with them with big stakes of 2 euros, they recommend the 2 euros are the same as a good bet. It's a trap provider who advertises on the internet forms for big returns or profit returns, it's a scam, I've been following them for too many years, get away those who play (pragmatic play) and are not streamers or involved

Social Media & Community Specialist

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

I was absolutely sure that you will pick up just this part of my answer. 🙂

I did say "some" and it does not mean that in every casino for every game, though.

But I fully understand that this "explanation" is the easiest and most welcomed one.

I will repeat now, most (not every single one) streamers make advertisements to gain profit - Still, I would not take such sessions as proof that casino games are rigged for regular players.

Senior Kenner

Österreich

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

hallo, ich habe jetzt über 30.000 spins bei big bass bonanza gemacht. hatte über 300 freispiele. kein einziges mal x10 und 4 mal nur x3. nur mehr angler ohne wert. manchmal 400-500 spins für ein freispiel. also ich finde, dass sich pragmatic play sehr zum schlechten gewendet hat. rtp unterirdisch und der rng wahrscheinlich seit einem halben jahr auf urlaub. für mich sind pragmatic slots ab heute tabu. habe diese spins bei einem casino gespielt.

Social Media & Community Specialist

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

Hello there,

That's quite a summary! I'm personally missing the amounts bet though, and the rest of the no-free-spins winnings. That would be another important part, I reckon.

Even though it seems you solely focused on free spins sessions. So, the point taken for FS, I guess.

May I know whether you played only the classic version?

Bearbeitet durch den Verfasser vor 1 Jahr

Senior Kenner

Österreich

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

hallo radka,

ich habe mit 50 cent gespielt. freispiele mit einem oder 2 angler waren sehr oft. das ich ins mal 2 gekommen bin etwa 100 mal. aber keine grossen gewinne. bei big bass muß man sich auf freispiele konzentrieren. aus dem spiel sehr schwer etwas zu gewinnen. ja ich habe die klasssische version gespielt.

Social Media & Community Specialist

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

Hello!

Thanks for the details, the "picture" seems to be complete now. I'm just asking myself whether you would gain the same result with the Megaways version. 🤔

Kenner

Griechenland

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

I would advise you not to open dialogues with REDKA, it doesn't make sense, her behavior is fascist,she deleted 13 of my online casino reviews because I probably insulted the agreed ones, she deleted evaluations that I had made here and 4 years old, you understand how much hate he has. The reason the reviews were deleted was because they had one star and were critical of the casino, you understand what is going on here. When you say that the spins on the slots are manipulated in some casinos, you are offending the casinos, they tell you that because you lose, you are complaining, so you should not affect interests, if you raise them, they will delete you, that means DEMOCRACY, I am from the country where DEMOCRACY was created, so I say my opinion about her. So everyone, write that some casinos that give a profit of 5% after 100 spins or more are good casinos and not casinos with hacked software. Many evaluations from others are more scathing than mine and they have not been bothered, it may have bothered her that I criticized the Provider of the theme, i.e. pragmatik play.

Bearbeitet durch den Verfasser vor 1 Jahr

Kenner

Griechenland

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

The huge wins from this PROVIDER are seen on the internet by 90% of people who have accounts and are viewed on twitch or by youtubers and so on. I have been playing the provider's games for many years, I have not had any luck with such wins that are circulating on the internet even once. The more likely it is that they delete my comment, it doesn't make these personal opinions read.

Frankey

Junior Experte

Deutschland

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

I don't know in what version of Democracy you live in, but in my version ' her behaviour is fascist ' is not an opinion, it's an insult.

Frankey

Kenner

Griechenland

Frankey

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

If she deleted 8 reviews because they were annoying, then you would consider her a Democrat and not bother her. Also if you put a lot of stars and say nice things you are accepted here because you don't bother anyone, do you get me?

Bearbeitet durch den Verfasser vor 1 Jahr

Social Media & Community Specialist

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

I would advise you not to open dialogues with REDKA, it doesn't make sense, her behavior is fascist,she deleted 13 of my online casino reviews because I probably insulted the agreed ones, she deleted evaluations that I had made here and 4 years old, you understand how much hate he has. The reason the reviews were deleted was because they had one star and were critical of the casino, you understand what is going on here. When you say that the spins on the slots are manipulated in some casinos, you are offending the casinos, they tell you that because you lose, you are complaining, so you should not affect interests, if you raise them, they will delete you, that means DEMOCRACY, I am from the country where DEMOCRACY was created, so I say my opinion about her. So everyone, write that some casinos that give a profit of 5% after 100 spins or more are good casinos and not casinos with hacked software. Many evaluations from others are more scathing than mine and they have not been bothered, it may have bothered her that I criticized the Provider of the theme, i.e. pragmatik play.

vor 1 Jahr

OriginalÜbersetzung

Hallo.

Erlauben Sie mir, hier die Gründe zu nennen, die Sie für diese Ablehnungen vorgebracht haben.

"Hallo und vielen Dank für Ihre Bewertung. Anscheinend haben Sie nicht erwähnt, warum das Casino so schlecht ist, abgesehen von der Tatsache, dass Sie verloren haben. Casinos haben immer einen Vorteil gegenüber Spielern, daher ist es in allen Casinos üblich, dass ein Spieler verliert Bitte schreiben Sie eine neue Bewertung mit mehr Details, damit sie für andere Spieler hilfreicher ist. Benutzerbewertungen sollten nicht als Rache für Casinos dienen, bei denen Sie Ihre Einzahlung verloren haben."

Plus:

"Hallo und vielen Dank für Ihre Bewertung. Anscheinend haben Sie nicht erwähnt, warum das Casino so schlecht ist, abgesehen von der Tatsache, dass Sie verloren haben. Casinos haben immer einen Vorteil gegenüber Spielern, daher ist es in allen Casinos üblich, dass ein Spieler verliert Bitte schreiben Sie eine neue Bewertung mit mehr Details, damit sie für andere Spieler hilfreicher ist. Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis."

Leider haben Sie das so persönlich genommen, ich habe kein Problem mit Ihnen, ich möchte nur die Benutzerbewertung unvoreingenommen halten.

Ist Ihnen aufgefallen, dass Sie bisher 27 Bewertungen eingereicht haben, davon 24 mal 1-Stern-Bewertungen, in denen verkündet wird, dass Casinos mehr oder weniger ein Betrug sind, weil Sie verloren haben – alles ist manipuliert?

Der letzte scheint wie eine Falle zu sein, indem er dasselbe Casino mit 5 Sternen vergibt, um Ihnen zu beweisen, dass nur gute Bewertungen genehmigt werden - mit "LOL". Ich sehe das als eine ziemlich unehrliche Situation. Bekomme das aber persönlich nicht hin.

Um das ganze Bild hier malen zu können: Nur zwei Mal haben Sie Casinos mit 2 Sternen ausgezeichnet.

Daher habe ich die Bewertungen ohne konkrete oder hilfreiche Informationen abgelehnt.

In Bezug auf andere Spieler berücksichtigen wir auch den Verlauf ihrer Benutzerbewertungen. In einer idealen Welt würde nichts davon existieren; Im Moment können wir nicht jeden Spieler rückwirkend überprüfen, also machen wir das nebenbei.

Es gibt keinen persönlichen Aspekt, uns fehlt derzeit nur die Zeit, um genaue Angaben zu bereits abgegebenen Bewertungen zu machen.

Hello there.

Allow me to mention here the reasons you got for those rejections.

"Hello and thank you for your review. It seems that you failed to mention why the casino is so bad, aside from the fact that you lost. Casinos always have an advantage over players so it's a common situation in all casinos that a player loses the deposit. Kindly write a new review with more details so it will be more helpful to other players. User reviews shouldn't serve as a revenge against casinos where you lost your deposit."

plus:

"Hello and thank you for your review. It seems that you failed to mention why the casino is so bad, aside from the fact that you lost. Casinos always have an advantage over players so it's a common situation in all casinos that a player loses the deposit. Kindly write a new review with more details so it will be more helpful to other players. Thank you for your understanding."

Sadly, you took that so personally, I have no problem with you, I only aim to keep the user rating unbiased.

Have you noticed you have submitted 27 reviews so far consisting of 24 times 1-star reviews proclaiming casinos are more or less a scam because you lost - all is manipulated?

The last one seems like a trap, awarding the same casino with 5 stars to give you proof only good reviews are approved- containing "LOL". I see that as quite a dishonest situation. Not getting that personally, though.

To paint the picture in full here: only two times you have awarded casinos with 2 stars.

Hence I rejected the reviews lacking any concrete or helpful information.

Regarding other players, we also consider their user reviews history. In an ideal world, none of those would exist; momentarily, we cannot check each player retroactively, so we do that along the way.

There's no personal aspect, we're just currently lacking the time to be precise regarding already submitted reviews.

Bearbeitet durch den Verfasser vor 1 Jahr

Daniel

Head of Community & Social Media