vor 9 Monaten
Week 6 since I made the first withdrawal request and I still don’t have the money.
Please make not the fault and play in this rip-off Scam Casino guys, please!
Snatch Casino - generelle Diskussion (Seite 23)
vor 9 Monaten
I can see that it has been going on for a long time, I wouldn't want to wait for that either. Once it was an investigation with the game provider, now I read that it is verification. I don't know if I should laugh or cry anymore.
I hope you won't have to wait much longer.
vor 9 Monaten
Einfach nur widerlich, was dieses beschissene Abzock-Casino mit seinen Kunden macht.
Schäbige Betrüger ohne System und nur am Lügen, bitte stuft dieses verschissene Casino runter, bitte..!
40 Tage reinste Lügen und Standard Texte oder erst gar keine Antworten von diesen Clowns im Casino..
Verfasst
vor 9 Monaten
I apologize for interrupting, but I am quite shocked by how frequently the same pattern occurs. I hope it will all come clearer in the complaint, because as long as complaints and forum posts are still active, players will notice, or at least I hope so!
vor 9 Monaten
I think more disgusting is the fact that casino.guru within 3-4 months seeing so much alerts from many customers of this "near to fraud" casino, don't want to reduce the high 8.9 safety index given to them. That's just strange. I will Never trust any safety index Painted here after this.
Verfasst
AntwortenBewerten2
vor 9 Monaten
Yes I wrote already the same two-three times. The reason why they don't do it is a bit strange.
I wait now 7 weeks for fucking 100 Dollar 😀
The approach of this Piss Casino is scamshit, never seen a rip-off tactic like this..
3,5 weeks for 'provider request' (that 100% never happened anyway by nobody, just a tactic to scam) and now 3,5 weeks for KYC (2 Photos, very hard to control in 3-4 weeks or more 😀) .
I'm glad I didn't win more money at this monkey casino. I am sorry for all who won more then 500 or more of thoundands Dollar..
Verfasst
AntwortenBewerten1
vor 8 Monaten
Agree with you 1000%, I’m waiting since 31 March for 7000e withdrawal, 1month for "fair play review" and 20+ days for KYC verifications and i was VIP customer… JOKE of a casino, they should be banned and sent to jail, all of them together with liar supports and useless KYC department!!! ❌❌❌ DON’T PLAY THERE ❌❌❌
AntwortenBewerten1
vor 8 Monaten
It's 900+. And up to now nothing is paid.
And nothing is said why don't they do.
Verfasst
AntwortenBewerten1
vor 8 Monaten
Agree with you 1000%, I’m waiting since 31 March for 7000e withdrawal, 1month for "fair play review" and 20+ days for KYC verifications and i was VIP customer… JOKE of a casino, they should be banned and sent to jail, all of them together with liar supports and useless KYC department!!! ❌❌❌ DON’T PLAY THERE ❌❌❌
vor 8 Monaten
I'm quite sorry about all this, to tell you the truth. These are terrible times to be waiting for money, and I wouldn't want to be in it myself. If I did get it, I would probably never come here again.
I hope this gets sorted out and works out well for everyone. 😥
vor 8 Monaten
Ihr müsst dieses widerliche Dreckscasino runterstufen.
Es ist nicht dasselbe wie davor, eigentlich muss es auf 0 gestuft werden und ab dem Datum, ab dem es aufgekauft wurde neu bewertet. Es hat NICHTS mehr mit der alten Casinogruppe und den Angeboten/dem Verfahren dahinter zu tun. Nur der Name des Casinos ist geblieben.
Bitte macht etwas, diese Betrüger Schweine müssen im Internet zur Show gestellt werden und die Leute müssen dringend gewarnt werden vor dieser abartigen Betrugsmasche!
Verfasst
AntwortenBewerten1
vor 8 Monaten
I think that's exactly what the forum and user reviews and complaints are for. Players know to alert themselves that all may not be well with the casino. We will do what we can according to our usual procedures.
AntwortenBewerten1
vor 8 Monaten
Looks like your "usual procedures" are usually useless or at least they are too late. Seems you "paint" your ratings for you and for the casinos but never for casino customers.
AntwortenBewerten1
vor 8 Monaten
I understand that anger and frustration are in place when players wait so long.
Anyway, every case must end so that we can say for sure that the casino made a mistake and did not pay out the player, or made some other fraud. Only then will the safety index change.
If you know how to do it better, so be it, you can make your own page and show us your methods. 🙂
We try to do best for players because without them we won't go far.
So every time we would try to do everything for casinos and favor them, it could backfire.
vor 8 Monaten
Das Casino hat doch aber NICHTS mehr mit dem alten Snatch Casino zu tun, warum werden dann nicht wie gesagt einfach alle alten Bewertungen vor April gelöscht und ab dem Zeitpunkt neu bewertet? Es ist ja wie ein neues Casino und leitet die Leute nur fehl..
Das Betrüger Casino kann wie jetzt schon einfach unter jeder Beschwerde 2 Jahre lang alle zwei Wochen schreiben: 'Wir geben das Beste und versuchen ihre Auszahlung zu beschleunigen' bla bla bla.
Dann ist der Fall ja trotzdem nicht geschlossen und man kann nicht bewerten. Warum gibt es da keine Grenzen von einem Monat? Weil alles was über einen Monat geht ist schon großer Betrug und hat nichts mehr mit normalem Vorgehen zu tun. Ich und mehrere andere warten seit 2 fucking Monaten auf unser Geld, denkt ihr echt die zahlen noch aus? 😀 Und ihr schützt es indirekt, das soll kein persönlicher Angriff sein aber das Vorgehen wirkt schon sehr eigenartig..
AntwortenBewerten1
vor 8 Monaten
Es müsste mindestens ein Vermerk angebracht werden, dass der Eigentümer gewechselt hat und die Beschwerden sich seitdem stark erhöht haben. Und eigentlich müsste man diesen Hinweis bei allen Casinos des alten Eigentümers ebenfalls anbringen. Denn auch dieser steht in der Verantwortung für seine Kunden.
AntwortenBewerten3
vor 8 Monaten
Because these ratings are bought and paid for. The new owners paid to buy the reputation of the original Snatch casino. Thats why they wont change it.
vor 8 Monaten
I still hope they don't. Sometimes I also have doubts, but I see the too much positive work they do and try to believe they aren't sold.
Verfasst
vor 8 Monaten
But the fact is that there are problems with safety indexes. Sure many people agree with that. I guess casino.guru just need a little -to revise the system of giving indexes. It will make people to trust to indexes more.
vor 8 Monaten
It is 100% the case. Why do you think askgamblers and casinoguru have different ratings for different casinos? Also notice how casinos with exclusive offers have higher ratings?
vor 8 Monaten
Es müsste mindestens ein Vermerk angebracht werden, dass der Eigentümer gewechselt hat und die Beschwerden sich seitdem stark erhöht haben. Und eigentlich müsste man diesen Hinweis bei allen Casinos des alten Eigentümers ebenfalls anbringen. Denn auch dieser steht in der Verantwortung für seine Kunden.
vor 8 Monaten
Actually, a change of ownership does not imply that the staff working in the casino or the rules governing it have changed; these are specifically the factors our Data Team considers when such changes occur. What we see here is the same for other casinos that have switched affiliates. These casinos continue to provide the same low-quality services. Sadly, as I believe someone already mentioned, the Safety Index is based on algorithms and statistical facts. Those facts say it was a poor experience, but the casino (and the others I mentioned) paid out.
That's pretty much it and I, too, would not play at those sites. This is why we keep the user ratings, complaints, and forum discussions in the same location, allowing anyone to compare those sources with the Safety Index before making a decision.
Though I understand that it is common practice to look at just one number... Well, I would personally prefer to lower Safety indexes for certain groups, but for that, my colleagues need unresolved complaints - aka facts. I fully understand that this rating is unsuitable for everyone. My personal advice: Please read all sources, not just one number. 🙏
Einen Beitrag hinzufügen
