vor 1 Jahr
This to me is an insane rule. -all 2500$ of my winnings which about half of were won playing roulette and blackjack were reduced to 200$ which was my deposit.
Shazam Casino - generelle Diskussion (Seite 2)
1
2
Einen Beitrag hinzufügen
vor 1 Jahr
You guys cannot possible have this as an 8.1 that fools people. This casino has so many hoops and ladders ment to screw over the player as if RTG slots didn’t already carry a massive house edge. Unbelievable. 20 time’s the deposit amount bet if you bet over 10$ you are screwed. Change the rating. This place sucks.
vor 1 Jahr
Hello.
Frankly, the max bet rule is pretty common and even if you submit a complaint, the moment we find out that you breached this rule, the complaint would be closed as unjustified. Simply because you got an advantage by accepting the bonus you are supposed to respect the max bet rule.
This is the reason we provide players with this information for each bonus we put in our database:
It's also pretty common that some of those bonuses are only available for slot games.
Each bonus has its terms and conditions this is no shady practice I dare to say.
vor 1 Jahr
No shady practice? I max bet like 2 times and when I did I hit a bonus. Literally I work in gaming and if anybody reads this thread do not red the reviews as genuine posted by this website because it isn’t true. Just go gamble on stake. At least you get a real shot at money rather than these risky dink shit holes on the internet. 8.1? Your criteria sucks. If you play on this be prepared to get CUCKED not fucked Cucked. Idgaf about the 200. I’m getting it back. What a LENGTHY TOS. You have no shot. The house edge has to be so dramatically increased because of this that you literally stand no shot of winning. NO SHOT. Do not take this websites advice. Do not play at any of these ghetto back water shade fest casinos. Nothing is provided to you upfront. I’m more pissed at your shit response than Shazam. Ban me delete the post or the account idgaf.
vor 1 Jahr
The max. bet rule is a standard rule applied to most of bonuses. It's very rare to find a bonus that doesn't have this rule attached to it.
Anyway, I can imagine a situation where even though the player breaches this rule, it wouldn't be fair to void all winnings. The rule exists in order to make sure that the player needs to play a certain amount of spins with the bonus before they complete the wagering requirement. Of course, that decreases the players chances on completing the wagering requirement and it also reduces the chance that a player gets some huge winning while playing with bonus money. That's why the size of bets is capped. Just in case it actually happens and the player wins a lot, then another rule comes in play - the "max. withdrawal limit from a bonus"
On the other hand, I remember numerous occasions when we favoured the player when it came to breaching this rule. It's typically in a case when the player plays a lot of spins, but breaches the max. bet one or two times without winning anything from it. In such a case, it's clear that the player just did a mistake which can happen when you wager hundreds or thousands spins on various games. The fact the player didn't have any significant win from the spin also shows that the player didn't get any unfair advantage by doing the mistake.
We also ask casinos to look at these cases as individual cases. You shouldn't just void the winnings because the max. bet rule was breached. It's necessary to look at other bets, the player's behaviour etc.
vor 1 Jahr
Before you play read the T&C's. This way you will know the rules before hand. Also the personnel at Casino.guru are very nice and very helpful. I think it would be proper for you to tone down your wording in this discussion. Not appropriate!!!
Bearbeitet durch den Verfasser vor 1 Jahr
vor 1 Jahr
Der Besitzer des fraglichen Casinos scheint Alistar Solutions NV und nicht Superior Group VIP zu sein
Automatische Übersetzung
vor 1 Jahr
Hello,
would you kindly share some documents, please? I will forward those to our Data Team.
Thank you.
vor 1 Jahr
This shows who owns the license - meaning can be a sub-company, not the actual casino owner.
When it comes to online casinos, finding the "end" owner is quite an investigation.
Stil, I will forward this to our data team just to make sure that we have not missed something.
Thank you.
vor 1 Jahr
Es ist sehr wahrscheinlich, dass Alistair Solutions NV die Website verwaltet und der direkte Eigentümer ist und keine anderen nützlichen Informationen auf der Plattform liest.
Bearbeitet durch den Verfasser vor 1 Jahr
Automatische Übersetzung
vor 1 Jahr
Kindly forward such information using the email: data@casino.guru next time - this is the proper team just for that.
Thank you very much.
I already forwarded that you are concerned abut the owner.
vor 1 Jahr
What rhymes with Shazam is scam .
vor 1 Jahr
If this is supposed to be a question, then I don't have any answer.
What happened with Shazam? 🤔
vor 1 Jahr
I came to Casino group to get a game that was well-established, and had no complaints as my friend had just gone through Not being paid for three weeks at another casino so I used one that guru recommended which was Shazam Casino. I started October 31 to try to get a withdraw. I have sent in my paperwork to two different emails four different times and they keep asking for the same form that comes over and over with the other paperwork. I finally gave up, once later, and spent my money, logged out of the account and I won’t go back to Shazam again! Casino guru, you may want to rethink putting this on your list again.
vor 1 Jahr
Hello,
Thank you for sharing!
It's quite the opposite actually. We intend to put every single casino on the list, so not a single one is hidden, the main purpose is to review all casinos. The idea is to warn against the bad ones as well as inform about the good ones.
It's a pity that you did not submit a complaint though. If the casino act unfairly, we are interested to know that and collect evidence to consider its reputation score.
KYC is quite an important process and the space for mistakes on both sides is pretty big, I'm sorry to hear that it did not work out well for you.
1
2
Der Community beitreten
Sie müssen angemeldet sein, um einen Beitrag zu veröffentlichen..
Bitte deaktivieren Sie Ihren AdBlocker