Selbstausschluss von allen Online-Casinos! (Seite 6)

Every little bit helps, thank you very much.

Toda ayuda es poca, muchas gracias.

👍

You are very welcome!

If you want to talk more, please do so. I'll find you here.

will commit suicide, because my permanent self exclusion has been ignored by TAP TAP, I have evidence of permanent self exclusion that they ignored. I lost so much. This pain has made me decide to commit suicide.

Friend, I hope what you're saying is just a moment of desperation. I understand, unfortunately, what you're going through. Think things through carefully and calmly. Nothing and no one deserves for you to take your own life. I recently had a relapse (I'm a gambling addict) and I'm in a very bad place, but my loved ones aren't to blame. You're worth more than any money you might have lost. Please seek help and be strong. What happened to you has a solution, but what you're threatening to do isn't.

Amigo eso que dices espero que sea un momento de desesperación, entiendo por desgracia por lo que estás pasando, medita bien las cosas en frío, nada ni nadie merece que te quites la vida, yo he tenido una recaída (soy ludópata) hace poco, y estoy muy mal, pero mis seres queridos no tienen la culpa, vales más que el dinero que hayas podido perder, por favor busca ayuda y sé fuerte, lo que te ha pasado tiene solución, lo que amenazas con hacer no.

Hey friend, is everything alright? How are you feeling?

Amigo, va todo bien? Cómo te encuentras?

I am really sorry for this situation. Please know that if you feel this way, you should surely reach for help.

Could you do that, please?

Ask anyone, tell them how you feel, don't keep it inside. 🙏

Too bad he's gone.

Sayang nya dia sudah tiada

Yes, I hope everything goes well for him.

Pues sí, espero que le vaya todo bien

He left a lot of memories, and his phone was not locked at all.

Dia meninggalkan banyak kenangan, dan handphone nya tidak terkunci sama sekali.

You don't joke about things like that, it's not normal in my opinion.

If someone has similar tendencies, they need to seek help, and joking about it on a forum is not appropriate in such cases.

You might want to think about that.

You didn't handle this matter well. He was a good friend of mine. His life was ruined. You didn't even bring the other parties to the dispute. He had suffered an injustice, and he brought it to you because you were his only hope. He presented evidence, and you simply dismissed the case.

Kalian tidak menangani masalah tersebut dengan baik. Dia teman baik saya. Kehidupaan nya hancur. Kalian bahkan tidak membawa pihak yg bersengketa untuk hadir. Dia telah mengalami ketidak adilan dia membawa ke kalian karena kalian satu satunya harapan untuk menghadirkan. Dia memberikan bukti bukti dan kalian menutup kasus tersebut begitu saja.

Hello, your post is obviously based on strong emotions. May I instead ask you for facts, please? I for example, have no idea what is going on, but I see you are very concerned.

Can you share the complaint details, please?

I do not want to be mean, but lawyers are more suitable to defend people from injustice. We are mediators.

You didn't call 188Bet/taptap at all. You saw Rey01's conversation in his complaint, where he provided ample evidence. And you keep asking for more evidence, even though he clearly has valid evidence showing he's trying to protect himself from the gambling activities 188bet/taptap is issuing.

You should have called 188bet/taptap to attend instead of closing the complaint, he suffered losses of more than 100,000,000 USD

Kalian tidak memanggil 188Bet/taptap sama sekali, kalian lihat percakapan Rey01 di pengaduaannya dia memberikan cukup banyak sekali bukti. Dan kalian terus meminta bukti yang lain meskipun jelas dia memiliki bukti valid yang menunjukan dia berusaha melindungi dirinya dari perjudiaan yang dikeluarkan 188bet/taptap.

Seharusnya kalian memanggil pihak 188bet/taptap untuk hadir bukan menutup pengaduaan dia mengalami merugikan lebih dari 100.000.000 usd

The casino issued a permanent self-exclusion form on their website. He completed it and received an approval email. However, the casino violated the terms by changing jurisdictions. So, the casino used that as an excuse to allow him to play again. But you asked for proof of the form violation. He has provided the final result in the form of a permanent self-exclusion approval email. But you keep asking for more proof?

Kasino tersebut mengeluarkan slef exclusion permanen dengan sistem mengisi formulir di web mereka. Dia telah mengisinya dan mendapatkan email persetujuan. Tapi Kasino melanggar ketentuan tersebut dengan perpindahan yuridiksi. Sehingga Kasino memakai alasan tersebut untuk membolehkannya bermain kembali. Tapi kalian meminta bukti penghinaan formulir. Dia telah memberikan hasil finalnya berbentuk email persetujuan slef exclusion parmanen. Tapi kalian terus meminta bukti yang lain ?

You should help him get what he deserves by presenting 188bet/taptap.

Instead of closing the case, he had very strong evidence: a verified email from the casino. A player trying to protect himself. He suffered significant losses. When his account was reactivated, it caused him to relapse.

I don't understand why you haven't brought in 188bet/taptap to clarify this issue. He's a player who completed KYC and all the necessary procedures.

sebaiknya kalian membantu dia untuk mendapatkan haknya. Dengan menghadirkan 188bet/taptap.

Bukan menutup kasus tersebut. Dia memiliki bukti yang sangat kuat email yang terverifikasi dari Kasino . seorang pemain yang bersuaha melindungi dirinya. Dia mengalami kerugian dalam jumlah besar. Ketika akun nya diaktifkan kembali dan membuat dia kambuh.

Saya tidak mengerti kenapa kalian tidak menghadirkan 188bet/taptap untuk mengklarifikasi masalah ini. Dia pemain yang melakukan KYC dan semua prosedur yang berlaku.

Just look at Natalie's last reply. The player simply did not provide what was necessary to continue with the case.

Our team has dealt with thousands of such cases, and we have our own procedures. If the player cannot provide what is necessary, unfortunately, this is the result. 😕

The email received is strong evidence that it is an agreement. Don't you understand about evidence?

Email yg diterima tdrsebut bukti yang kuat itu sebuah perjanjian apakahbkalian tidak mengerti tentang bukti?

You're acting like a judge, not a mediator. Let the casino explain why the problem occurred. Inviting them is the best approach. A mediator needs to present both parties, no matter how small the evidence. You appear to be protecting the casinos.

Kalian bertindak seperti hakim bukan mediator biarkan kasino yang menjelaskan kenapa masalah itu bisa terjadi. Mengundang mereka adalah jalan terbaik. Mediator perlu menghadirkan dua belah pihak sekecil apapun bukti. Kalian terlihat seperti melindungi kasino kasino tersebut