Logische Konsequenz eingestehen und die Änderungen des Gesetzes revidieren!

I would be in favor of simplifying the legislation.

Which is difficult or almost impossible to enforce in its current form.

- It contradicts international law.

- Is vaguely formulated which creates a lot of gaps and gray areas.

Schleswig-Hollstein's previous arrangement was much better.

The so-called :

"Law of the State of Schleswig-Holstein on the Taxation of Online Casino Games" of 9 March 2022

To date, the only licensing authority for internet casinos in Germany.

It is difficult to understand why a need for action was determined here.

Which ultimately led to the replacement of the law by the "New German Online Gambling Act".

The point of taxation, which is essential for state authorities, the transparency obligation and security are very well worked out here.

In addition, the starting point here was European companies.

Prerequisite for a permit for the operation of online casinos in Germany was a company based in Europe.

The free competition as well as the principle of equal rights for the purpose of the competitiveness of the companies was oriented here clearly more openly and in the sense of the European community.

Here the legislators are obliged to make corrections!

Simon Kirmizitas

Bin mir nicht sicher, ob ich es richtig verstanden habe.

Ist das eine Art offener Brief an die betroffenen Behörden?

Ich würde vermuten, dass lokale Spieler größtenteils zustimmen würden - nur meine Vermutung. 🙂

Yes, that's another way to put it, or even an appeal for a sensible solution!

Constructive criticism in the broadest sense!

In dem Fall: Gut gemacht! Mich würde nur interessieren, ob sich in den letzten Jahren irgendetwas verändert hat?